[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: backportability of filetea


Am Dienstag, den 29.11.2011, 23:24 +0100 schrieb Alberto Garcia:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:32:23PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > I looked into backporting filetea to squeeze, because I’d like to
> > install it on my server and hack a bit on it. But it seems that it
> > is non-trivial to do.
> Hey,
> thanks for the e-mail. I actually did the same when I finished
> packaging it and found the same problems as you.
> The truth is that some of those dependencies can probably be relaxed
> (it was me who told upstream to lower the gnutls requirement from 3.0
> to 2.12) but IIRC I had a discussion with him and it seemed difficult
> to make it work with the packages available in squeeze-backports.

I quickly gave relaxing the dependencies a shot, but also quickly
decided that it would be too much effort.


Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: