On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:57:32PM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 04:40:36PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > > Second: I am both the upstream author of rrdcollect software and also > > a maintainer of rrdcollect Debian package. For my own purpose I am > > backporting new releases of the software to stable and I don't mind to > > provide a support for rrdcollect to a wider audience, at least until lenny > > become oldstable. > lenny-backports will exist until support for Lenny is dropped officially > (usually one year after it became oldstable). Backports, thus, should be > supported for that period of time as well. Sounds fair. > > So, my question is: are you interested in having rrdcollect in backports.org > > archive? > So, if you're willing to support your backport for the entire life-time > of lenny-backports and users will benefit from the backport, it's a > valid candidate for bpo, imho. I'm willing to support rrdcollect for the entire life-time of lenny-backports. And yes, I believe users will benefit from the backport. Regards Artur
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature