Re: updated KVM packages?

To: Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de>
Cc: backports-users@lists.backports.org
Subject: Re: updated KVM packages?
From: Sascha Silbe <sascha-ml-debian-backports-users@silbe.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:56:07 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20091231105607.GA6187@twin.sascha.silbe.org>
Mail-followup-to: Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de>, backports-users@lists.backports.org
Reply-to: Sascha Silbe <sascha-ml-reply-to-2009-4@silbe.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20091231103844.GA21617@nelson.snow-crash.org>
References: <[🔎] 20091229135549.GB30112@twin.sascha.silbe.org> <[🔎] 20091231103844.GA21617@nelson.snow-crash.org>

On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 11:38:52AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:

[updated KVM backport]

I did some pre-leminary packages during the congress and after themtesting I
would upload them.

Great, thanks!

But I give no gurantees for 2.6.26 as they are not my primary target.Using newer kernels is recommended for kvm usage.

I would long have upgraded to 2.6.3x for completely different reasons,but unfortunately I'm stuck with older kernels due to fglrx (more recentversions with 2.6.3x support depend on the latest Xorg packages). :-/


CU Sascha

--
http://sascha.silbe.org/
http://www.infra-silbe.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- updated KVM packages?
  - From: Sascha Silbe <sascha-ml-debian-backports-users@silbe.org>
- Re: updated KVM packages?
  - From: Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de>

Prev by Date: Re: updated KVM packages?
Previous by thread: Re: updated KVM packages?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread