Re: Request: bind9-doc_9.3.4-2etch3

[Stalks <stalks@nooblet.org>]

Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Stalks <backports.org_backports-users@stalks.nooblet.org> [2008-07-10 12:15:36 CEST]:
>   
> > With the current buzz about the bind9 bug, I think its quite important
> > to get sarge up to date as soon as possible.
> >     
>
>  Erm, or upgrade to etch finally? Security support for sarge has been
> suspended since February 29th[1], and sarge-backports has also announced
> its end of lifetime[2] for March 31st, which is long overdue.
>
>   
> > So if those reponsible for sarge-backports could backport the fixed
> > bind9 package, we would all be grateful, thanks.
> >     
>
>  Please finally upgrade to etch, or build the package yourself, thanks.
>
>   
> > Read more about this particular issue with bind9 at:
> >     
>
>  Read more about these particular announcements with sarge support at:
>
> [1] <http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2008/msg00001.html>
> [2] <http://lists.backports.org/lurker-bpo/message/20080229.184023.9bc01cb3.en.html>
>
>  So long,
> Rhonda
>   

Thank you for putting things straight, I wasn't aware of backports-sarge 
being discontinued.

Sorry to have offended you. Certainly seems like I did with the manner 
of your reply. It wasn't my intention.


</unsubscribe>