Re: Packages for adoption
Russ Allbery <email@example.com> writes:
> This policy means that I'm much less likely to upload backports unless
> someone can explain how to use pbuilder to generate an acceptable
> package. pbuilder in the configurations with which I'm familiar
> generates the source package outside of the chroot and the binary
> packages inside the chroot, so in order to comply with this policy, I'd
> either need to use a pure etch system to build backports or manually
> build in the chroot rather than using the pbuilder automation.
Ignore me -- I don't know what I'm talking about. The source package used
to seed the pbuilder build is then ignored and the source package is
regenerated, so of course pbuilder in its regular configuration is fine.
Sorry about the noise.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>