Hi, On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:30:12PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > a.) have a second suite for the backports >> etch version and keep a > frozen sarge. > > Advantage: Keeps an upgrade path of sarge+bpo -> clean etch. I think this adds a lot more confusion but benefits only very rare cases. > b.) the above, ie. make it a technical requirement that versions have to > be etch >> sarge. Where a new hidden setting would be added to the > bpo archive that contains the etch version numbers. (Plain etch + > security). I really like that idea. Cheers, Sebastian -- Sebastian "tokkee" Harl GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC http://tokkee.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature