Re: Upgrading to etch.
Qua, 2007-04-11 às 18:40 +0200, Micha Lenk escreveu:
> Luis Matos schrieb:
> > Qua, 2007-04-11 às 17:28 +0200, Alexander Wirt escreveu:
> >> Luis Matos schrieb am Mittwoch, den 11. April 2007:
> >>
> >> > Putting etch in sources.list and removing backports always works.
> >> >
> >> > (using dist-upgrade)
> >> >
> >> > versions in backports are always smaller than testing, wich makes the
> >> > transition easier.
> >> I have a BIG BIG BIG disclaimer here, as we don't stop sarge-bpo it can
> >> happen that versions in sarge-bpo can be greater than in etch which can lead
> >> to broken upgrade paths from sarge -> etch.
> > yes, yes ...
> >
> > agreed
> >
> > the answear to it is to use etch + backports entries in sources.list.
>
> No, I would *never* recommend to use etch together with sarge-backports,
> even if there where packages newer than etch in sarge-backports.
> Packages in sarge-backports should always be built in a clean Sarge
> environment -- even after Etch has been released and testing has become
> Lenny.
no, no ... i mean etch + etch-backports :P
>
> Micha
Reply to: