Re: linux-image in sarge-backports/main newer than in etch/main?

To: backports-users@lists.backports.org
Subject: Re: linux-image in sarge-backports/main newer than in etch/main?
From: Norbert Tretkowski <norbert@tretkowski.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:24:09 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20070219182409.GA3284@kyllikki.home.inittab.de>
Mail-followup-to: backports-users@lists.backports.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070219173853.GA11762@dementia.proulx.com>
References: <[🔎] 20070219173853.GA11762@dementia.proulx.com>

* Bob Proulx wrote:
> Hmm...  Why are the backports.org linux-image's newer than the ones
> in testing?

Because they include important security fixes, and we know that we
will see the new packages in testing soon.

                Norbert

Reply to:

References:
- linux-image in sarge-backports/main newer than in etch/main?
  - From: bob@proulx.com (Bob Proulx)

Prev by Date: linux-image in sarge-backports/main newer than in etch/main?
Next by Date: Re: upgrading kernel 2.6.8 -> 2.6.18
Previous by thread: linux-image in sarge-backports/main newer than in etch/main?
Next by thread: Re: upgrading kernel 2.6.8 -> 2.6.18
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread