Re: amd64: subversion_1.3.2-5~bpo1 broken(?)

To: backports-users@lists.backports.org
Cc: Daniel Franke <franke.daniel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: amd64: subversion_1.3.2-5~bpo1 broken(?)
From: bob@proulx.com (Bob Proulx)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:03:40 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20070201030340.GA22124@dementia.proulx.com>
In-reply-to: <45C0E980.6010402@modsoftsys.com>
References: <640ad44b0701290557i3a991017r712851c6dd02bb91@mail.gmail.com> <20070131023511.GA7208@dementia.proulx.com> <640ad44b0701310216y2ea8a1eaxf03a0c94c8cd3182@mail.gmail.com> <20070131174858.GA32180@dementia.proulx.com> <45C0E980.6010402@modsoftsys.com>

Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> - -=| Bob Proulx, 31.01.2007 19:48 |=-
> > Where is COMPAT_ARCHS coming from?  I have never encountered it in
> 
> apt-0.7 by any chance?

Maybe but why would that be on a stable plus backports box?  Backports
only has 0.6.46.2~bpo.1 so far.  Etch/Sid has 0.6.46.4.  Apt 0.7.0 is
experimental only.

Bob

Reply to:

Next by Date: Re: amd64: subversion_1.3.2-5~bpo1 broken(?)
Next by thread: Re: amd64: subversion_1.3.2-5~bpo1 broken(?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread