[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Subversion backport question



On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:17:53AM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > I have a backport of subversion 1.3.0 which I built for myself a
> > while back.
> 
> What did you use instead java-gcj-compat-dev? Please send me an
> interdiff of the .diff.gz between your package and the one in
> unstable.
> 
I used a Sun JVM I built with java-package.  The compressed interdiff is
attached.

> > I am wondering why the javahl support library is still not built
> > with it.
> 
> Because it requires java-gcj-compat-dev which is not available in
> sarge.
> 
I see.  I am guessing that this is the case so that subversion does
not get forced into contrib.  I may have to hang on to my own backport
then until Etch releases.

>                 Norbert

Regards,

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto

Attachment: svn_1.3.0_1.4.0.inter.diff.gz
Description: Binary data

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: