Re: kernel 2.6.15 compile extra modules needs gcc-4.0????
On 15/02/06, Norbert Tretkowski <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
There's no difference in the package names, unstable and backports.org
have the new linux-image-foo packages which contains the kernel and
the modules, and the transitional kernel-image-foo packages, which are
empty, but have a dependency on the linux-image-foo packages.
Yes, it was just a pinning problem. There was an entry in apt.conf for
default-distribution, which I didn't see, and unstable ended up pinned