Re: kernel 2.6.15 compile extra modules needs gcc-4.0????

[Brian Brunswick <brian.brunswick@gmail.com>]

On 15/02/06, Norbert Tretkowski <norbert@tretkowski.de> wrote:

There's no difference in the package names, unstable and backports.org
have the new linux-image-foo packages which contains the kernel and
the modules, and the transitional kernel-image-foo packages, which are
empty, but have a dependency on the linux-image-foo packages.

                Norbert

Yes, it was just a pinning problem. There was an entry in apt.conf for
default-distribution, which I didn't see, and unstable ended up pinned
above backports.

-- 
Brian_Brunswick____brian@ithil.org____Wit____Disclaimer____!Shortsig_rules!