[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RC bugs with openCV [Was: siril 0.9.11-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on...]



Dear Ole,

It looks like that pkg-config has been reintroduced (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942562). What about the autoremoval ?

Le ven. 18 oct. 2019 à 10:03, Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> a écrit :
Hi Cyril,

Please also follow Bug#942562 <https://bugs.debian.org/942562> which
asks to re-introduce pkgconfig.

This may also affect the "freeture" package, which has a openCV
dependency as well...

Cheers

Ole

Cyril Richard <cyril.richard42@gmail.com> writes:

> Dear Ole and debian-astro community,
>
> OK, thanks for this information. We will work on it asap.
>
> Le jeu. 17 oct. 2019 à 10:24, Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> a écrit :
>
>  Hello Cyril,
>
>  Cyril Richard <cyril.richard42@gmail.com> writes:
>  > Today I've received an email warning me that siril 0.9.11-1 is marked
>  > for autoremoval from testing on 2019-11-01.  This is because, I think,
>  > we forgot to close the RC bugs 922596 on last version.  We are about
>  > to release a new upstream version (ASAP, but maybe in two weeks), so
>  > how we should to proceed?  Is it possible to just update the
>  > changelog, hence closing the issue? Should I wait for the new upstream
>  > version ?  I want to avoid the autoremoval process.
>
>  I just tried to re-build siril with the new opencv, and got the error
>
>  checking for OPENCV... no
>  checking for OPENCV... no
>  checking for OPENCV... no
>  configure: error: opencv not found. Not using some image processing.
>
>  It seems that siril still uses pkgconfig to detect opencv:
>
>  configure:7720: checking for OPENCV
>  configure:7727: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "opencv >= 3.0"
>  Package opencv was not found in the pkg-config search path.
>  Perhaps you should add the directory containing `opencv.pc'
>  to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
>  [...]
>
>  This detection should be replaced with something else.
>
>  Best regards
>
>  Ole


Reply to: