[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Munipack 0.5.10 review

Hi Ole,

yes, I'll.

Do you can point me on the magic lintian which
issues the warnings (for future convenience)? 
I checked it by one included to sid:

x@sid:/var/cache/pbuilder/result$ lintian -E -I --pedantic
I: munipack source: debian-watch-uses-insecure-uri ftp://integral.physi
P: munipack source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
x@sid:/var/cache/pbuilder/result$ lintian --version
Lintian v2.5.68

Thank you,

On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 13:50 +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hi Filip,
> Filip Hroch <hroch@physics.muni.cz> writes:
> > I prepared new upstream version of Munipack.
> > Please, review of the code.
> Lintian issues two warnings:
> W: munipack source: dependency-is-not-multi-archified munipack
> depends on munipack-cli (multi-arch: no)
> W: munipack source: dependency-is-not-multi-archified munipack
> depends on munipack-gui (multi-arch: no)
> Cause for this is that you set the "munipack" binary package to
> "Multi-Arch: same".
> The "munipack" binary package however is completely architecture
> independent (it is just a metapackage), so it should be
> "Architecture:
> all" instead of "Architecture: any". Sorry that I didn't see that
> before.
> Could you change this? And consequently remove its "Multi-Arch"
> entry?
> Cheers
> Ole
F. Hroch              e-mail: hroch@physics.muni.cz, tel.: +420549494470
Dept. of theor. physics and astrophysics, MU Brno, Kotlarska 2,CZ-611 37

Reply to: