Re: Request for Munipack package review
Hi Ole,
thank you for uploading!
I'll wait with the minor changes on result of CI tests.
FH
On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 10:08 +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hey Filip,
>
> the package is fine now; I will upload.
>
> Filip Hroch <hroch@physics.muni.cz> writes:
> > I corrected everything as you suggested. The corrections
> > are available in the git repository. The dependency
> > package is very nice to me (It wasn't work for me
> > some time ago).
>
> Yea! This seems to be the perfect solution.
>
> > I'm only in doubts with fmin.f95. If I understanded,
> > the licence is GPL-3+ (is it right?) so I merged
> > the licence with the others. Can be the re-arrange
> > supposted as the right way?
>
> Yes. You don't need to specify the additional files after "*", since
> they are also covered by "*", but this should not be a problem.
>
> One small remark to debian/upstream/metadata: You probably misunderstood
> the "Reference" field. This should contain a document which you wish to
> be cited, not just your name. For the current upload, I removed that
> section; You can re-add it with a reference if you like. The reference
> is displayed on our web page:
>
> https://blends.debian.org/astro/tasks/datareduction#munipack
>
> and the information is taken here from the git rpository anyway.
>
> Best regards
>
> Ole
--
F. Hroch e-mail, jabber: hroch@physics.muni.cz, tel.: +420549494470
Dept. of theor. physics and astrophysics, MU Brno, Kotlarska 2,CZ-611 37
Reply to: