On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:46:53AM +0200, Vincent Prat wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> Thank you for the review.
> >The latest version is 0.4.
> Where have you found this? On both Pypi and Github, the latest release is
> 0.2.2.
wrar@belkar ~/tmp/astroquery-0.2.1 $ uscan --verbose --report
-- Scanning for watchfiles in .
-- Found watchfile in ./debian
-- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:
opts=filenamemangle=s/.+\/v?(\d\S*)\.tar\.gz/astroquery-$1\.tar\.gz/,uversionmangle=s/(\d)[_\.\-\+]?((RC|rc|pre|dev|beta|alpha)\d*)$/$1~$2/ https://github.com/astropy/astroquery/tags .*/v?(\d\S*)\.tar\.gz
-- Found the following matching hrefs:
/astropy/astroquery/archive/v0.2.2.tar.gz (0.2.2)
/astropy/astroquery/archive/v0.2.1.tar.gz (0.2.1)
/astropy/astroquery/archive/v0.2.tar.gz (0.2)
/astropy/astroquery/archive/v0.4.tar.gz (0.4)
/astropy/astroquery/archive/v0.2-rc2.tar.gz (0.2~rc2)
/astropy/astroquery/archive/v0.2-rc.tar.gz (0.2~rc)
/astropy/astroquery/archive/v0.1.tar.gz (0.1)
Newest version on remote site is 0.4, local version is 0.2.1
=> Newer version available from
https://github.com/astropy/astroquery/archive/v0.4.tar.gz
-- Scan finished
> >Also, I couldn't actually build the package because of missing
> >python3?-astropy-helpers.
> Version 0.2 needed astropy-helpers to build, so I asked the maintainer of
> astropy to package astropy-helpers as well.
> The package is now in the NEW queue.
Well, I cannot (at least easily) build packages depending on packages in NEW
(or on any packages not in the archive, for that matter).
> However, it seems that astropy_helpers is now included in the astroquery
> source tarball.
> Maybe I should remove the dependencies and use the bundled version. What is
> your opinion about this?
If it's intended to be used as a public module you need to package it as
such, it doesn't matter much whether it's a separate tarball. In any
case, if it's already packaged as a separate source package you shouldn't
use bundled versions too.
--
WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature