Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?)

To: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
Cc: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?)
From: Martin <debacle@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:46:28 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20240110104628.Horde.VG6FlqwkeMTkhEn634TsSMR@webmail.in-berlin.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20240110083710.f2pysf2zpaqljdjr@shell.thinkmo.de>
References: <[🔎] 20240107220748.rykbtd7kaniu47yn@shell.thinkmo.de> <[🔎] 4d416146-1bf6-4cb2-8dc8-80c298541dce@app.fastmail.com> <[🔎] 20240110083710.f2pysf2zpaqljdjr@shell.thinkmo.de>

Quoting Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>:

But why?  What is provided by an armel userland that armhf can't?


My employer runs Debian on this armv5(?) hardware:

https://www.taskit.de/produkte/embedded-produkte/computer-on-module/132/stamp9g20-512f/128r

Sure, the kernel is not the Debian one, but something around 4.19.

Cheers

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?)
  - From: Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com>

References:
- What to do with d-i on armel?
  - From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
- Re: What to do with d-i on armel?
  - From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
- Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?)
  - From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?)
Next by Date: Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?)
Previous by thread: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?)
Next by thread: Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread