[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1012347: arm64 CPU Phytium FT-2000/4 cpuinfo



Hello Punit,
On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 09:40:08AM +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de> writes:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 09:47:03AM +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> >> "xiao sheng wen(肖盛文)" <atzlinux@sina.com> writes:
> >> 
> >> > 在 2022/6/5 21:18, Helge Kreutzmann 写道:
> >> >>> CPU implementer	: 0x70
> >> >> If you happen to know a table of "CPU implementer" for ARM (i.e. a
> >> >> mapping of the number to the company), then I can easily add even
> >> >> more :-))
> >> 
> >> You can see the list of currently assigned implementer codes in the
> >> description of the MIDR_EL1 register[0] in the Arm developer
> >> documentation.
> >> 
> >> [0] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0595/2021-06/External-Registers/MIDR-EL1--Main-ID-Register
> >
> > Thanks a lot, I added those, should greatly improve detection on Arm.
> > Interestingly, though, the recently reported "Phytium" is not on the
> > list. (Which what this report was initially about)
> 
> Indeed, I noticed it too after sending the mail. Sorry, I don't know
> what's going on there. Probably need somebody from Arm.com to add their
> 2c.

I don't think we need to bother, the current state is now vastly
improved, and I take Phytium as a "bonus".

Greetings

          Helge

-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     debian@helgefjell.de
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: