Re: Bug#1018076: mini-transition: gjs built against mozjs102
> On Sep 25, 2022, at 3:08 PM, Simon McVittie <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 mini-transition: gjs built against mozjs102
> Control: unblock -1 by 1018819
> Control: tags -1 = pending
>> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 11:19:30 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> I think we need to be looking at the possibility of doing
>> architecture-specific removals of gjs and dependent packages from armel.
> We were able to get mozjs102_102.3.0-1 compiling and passing most of
> its test suite on armel and all other release architectures (thanks
> to Adrian Bunk and Mike Hommey for providing the necessary patches),
> and gjs_1.74.0-2 has built successfully against it on all release
> architectures and is also passing tests, so I'm now hoping we can keep
> the full GNOME 43 family of packages on armel for Debian 12.
Could you blacklist the test
on all affected big-endian targets (powerpc, ppc64, sparc64)?
The test is blacklist on s390x and fails on powerpc and ppc64 as well.