Re: Bug#1003165: scikit-learn in unstable FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el and s390x
Hi Christian!
On 2/16/22 12:33, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> Bus errors are normally easy to spot. Just run the code in question through
>> GDB and see where it crashes. Then look at the backtrace with the debug
>> symbols installed.
>>
>> Usually it's a result of bad pointer arithmetics which should definitely be
>> fixed as such operations usually violate the C/C++ standards.
>>
>> I can have quick look.
>
> one of these errors has been reported in the past, and I already did
> some analysis way back then:
>
> https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/16443
>
> Check the last comment. The relevant Cython code doesn't look wrong, so
> I guess the problem is with the binary result produced during build, as
> you point out.
I'm happy to look at this issue but first the baseline issue must be fixed
as this is a Debian Policy violation.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Reply to:
- References:
- scikit-learn in unstable FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el and s390x
- From: Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>
- Re: scikit-learn in unstable FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el and s390x
- From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
- Re: Bug#1003165: scikit-learn in unstable FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el and s390x
- From: Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org>
- Prev by Date:
Re: scikit-learn in unstable FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el and s390x
- Next by Date:
Re: Bug#1003165: scikit-learn in unstable FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el and s390x
- Previous by thread:
Re: Bug#1003165: scikit-learn in unstable FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el and s390x
- Index(es):