Re: Arm ports build machines (was Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns)
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> wrote:
>> also worth noting, they're working on a 2U rackmount server which
>> will have i think something insane like 48 Rock64Pro boards in one
>> full-length case.
> None of this addresses the basic DSA requirement of remote management.
> Troubling local hands to change a disk once in a while is reasonable; being
> blocked waiting for a power cycle on a regular basis is not (and I can't
> imagine hosting sponsors are wild about their employees' time being used
> for that either).
i know exactly what you mean, i've had to deal with data centres.
i'll make sure that TL Lim is aware of this, and will ask him if
there's a way to include remote power-management / power-cycling of
boards in the planned product or if it's already been thought of.
l.
Reply to:
- References:
- Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns
- From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
- Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concernsj
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
- Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concernsj
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Arm ports build machines (was Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns)
- From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
- Re: Arm ports build machines (was Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns)
- From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net>
- Re: Arm ports build machines (was Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns)
- From: Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org>