Re: Anyone using stretch/buster/sid on ARMv4t ?

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>]

std::future was fixed a while ago by upstream. It now works on any target even when there are no lock-free atomics in hardware.

See: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735

Btw, prior that, you would actually need at least ARMv7.

Adrian

On Nov 9, 2017, at 6:40 PM, Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk> wrote:

On 2017-11-07, Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> wrote:

This whole "so many packages are broken on armel" narrative

is actually mostly FUD, and you are suggesting mitigations

for a nonexisting problem.

Have we gotten full c++11 support on armel yet ?

(future, atomic, ...)

/Sune