Re: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC16
On 2016-07-22, Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> wrote:
> is the lack of direct support for C++11 atomics - it's possible to use
> a kernel helper to cover for this lack, but performance will be
> terrible.
This is going to be a real problem for Qt in the very near future. A
requirement for qt 5.7 is a c++11 compliant compiler. Or well. The
whatever subset that msvc2012 can handle.
And one of them is the atomics.
I do think that in 2016, it is a fair requirement to be able to use
languages standardized in 2011.
/Sune
Reply to: