Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
On 14/06/16 12:36, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 11:38:06AM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> * Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> [2016-06-06 15:14]:
>>> However, I will admit (again) that armel is starting to lose upstream
>>> support in some cases. I'm tempted to suggest that Stretch should be
>>> the last release for armel for that reason.
>>
>> Which upstream problems do you see?
>
> There's a few projects that have abandoned claiming to support
> anything below ARMv7. The one that comes to mind most readily is
> libv8, but there have been others.
Haskell had issues as well:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-haskell/2015/11/msg00016.html
Emilio
Reply to: