On 2016-06-05 13:38 +0000, Niels Thykier wrote: > peter green: > > On 05/06/16 11:01, Niels Thykier wrote: > >> all arm ports have DSA concerns. > >> > > Is there a current reference to what these concerns are? Is there still > > a lack of out of band management? (the old mail I found on the topic > > said it was "being worked on", sledge whats the status here?) are there > > other concerns? > > https://release.debian.org/stretch/arch_qualify.html is what I know of. For arm64 this says "multiple concerns (strong): management of existing hosts" I don't actually know what that means, but I probably should. I guess sledge knows? We have 3 APM machines in the US (on permanent loan from Linaro), 2 Juno machines at ARM Cambridge and 1 AMD Seattle (proper server-grade box) machine at ARM, which sledge just installed in the rack - it may well not actually be in service yet? What is the problem with the management of these machines? > >> - armel has a RT concern about lack of buildds (only 2) > >> > > I think this is outdated, my understanding is that armel and armhf are > > now using a shared buildd pool. I see arnold, hoiby, henze, hasse, > > antheil and hartmann recently active on the armel buildd page and the > > same on the armhf page. > > > Ok, so a total of 6 shared between the two architectures? And I think we are building armhf on the arm64 build machines too? Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature