On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:05:06PM +0200, niels@thykier.net wrote: > > * Which architectures are you committing to be an active porter for? > * Please describe recent relevant porter contributions. > * Are you running/using Debian testing or sid on said port(s)? > * Are you testing/patching d-i for the port(s)? > * If we were to enable -fPIE/-pie by default in GCC-6, should that change > also apply to this port? [0] > >Feel free to use the following template as your reply: Hi Niels, I'm a porter for armel, armhf and arm64. For all 3 architectures, I host and maintain buildds, work on d-i and installation support, work on core arch-specific things like toolchain and glibc and I triage and fix other bugs. I'm a DD. In terms of -fPIE/-pie, I'm happt that we are ready to enable by default. I've checked with the gcc maintainers in ARM too, and the worst effect we expect is a small performance impact. If anything more crops up, we have expert help available. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com "Because heaters aren't purple!" -- Catherine Pitt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature