Hey, Em Qua, 2013-08-21 às 16:36 -0400, Joey Hess escreveu: > Sounds like the same kind of "surely noone uses this" rationalization we > always see when going back to see why some package we use got removed > from Debian. I know nothing about armel honestly, just relaying what I was told, sorry if I'm misrepresenting. > > Would there be anyone opposed to no longer building WebKitGTK+ for > > armel? > > I suppose you could start by considering both Raspberry Pi users and > Samsung Chromebook users. Neither may use exactly armel, but either > could be affected by this. (Raspian is probably based on armel.) > > More generally, there is a vast amount of arm systems with displays > attached. Arm was probably used mostly headless 10 years ago, but this > is increasignly not the case, and I was using webkit on arm systems over > 5 years ago. Yeah, I am not talking about ARM in general, I can list a bunch of armhf users of this package myself, what I was told was armel was not really being used for this kind of stuff. I guess there are people who oppose the removal of this support, so I won't be pursuing this option, thanks for your input! Cheers, -- Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org> Debian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part