Re: armel qualification for Wheezy
- To: Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>
- Cc: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>, Hector Oron <hector.oron@gmail.com>, Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: armel qualification for Wheezy
- From: Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 11:01:30 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120519090130.GT1610@anguilla.noreply.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>, Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>, Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>, Hector Oron <hector.oron@gmail.com>, Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4FB7605F.7040703@debian.org>
- References: <[🔎] E1SUdCk-00057f-0K@kaa.jungle.funky-badger.org> <[🔎] 4FB43F50.1040507@p10link.net> <[🔎] 1337230818.28758.2.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> <[🔎] 20120517121833.GA9173@einval.com> <[🔎] 20120519082812.GP1610@anguilla.noreply.org> <[🔎] 4FB7605F.7040703@debian.org>
On Sat, 19 May 2012, Luk Claes wrote:
> As everyone keeps claiming there is no armel buildd location redundancy,
> I don't have much motivation to keep ancina running. It's ignored anyway.
It's been down for a week or longer now. I sent you email, you didn't
answer.
We have no out of band management, no serial console, no remote power.
And even if it worked, it alone would not be able to keep up.
--
| .''`. ** Debian **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
| `- http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: