Re: armel qualification for Wheezy
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 06:00:18AM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
>On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 00:59 +0100, peter green wrote:
>> The statement that all but one armel buildd is at the same location disagrees with
>> the debian machines database.
>[...]
>> Metropolitan Area Network Darmstadt : arcadelt
>> DG-i: argento
>
>They may still be physically located there, but:
>
>wanna-build=> select username, max(last_seen) as last_seen from
>armel.users group by username having username like '%arcadelt' or
>username like '%argento' order by 2;
> username | last_seen
>-----------------------+----------------------------
> buildd_armel-arcadelt | 2011-04-17 21:14:11.291825
> buildd_armel-argento | 2011-10-23 00:12:31.850723
>(2 rows)
>
>iirc they're only still hosted in case e.g. the ARM hosting falls over
>for a prolonged period, but I'm happy to be corrected on that.
AFAIK it's something like that, yes. Again, we're expecting to add
more v7 machines to the cluster in York soon-ish to help with this.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
Is there anybody out there?
Reply to: