[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: [kbibtex] FTBS on armel
To
: Bastien ROUCARIES <
roucaries.bastien@gmail.com
>
Cc
:
debian-arm@lists.debian.org
,
657446@bugs.debian.org
Subject
: Re: [kbibtex] FTBS on armel
From
: peter green <
plugwash@p10link.net
>
Date
: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 03:35:40 +0000
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
4F3F1C8C.30403@p10link.net
>
In-reply-to
: <
[🔎]
CAE2SPAZZph1bL64_1AAxovr-pbuy8m8k41wCapqrYe1Jfcg+qw@mail.gmail.com
>
References
: <201201261216.58062.roucaries.bastien@gmail.com> <CAE2SPAZOXQ_=F9tJwumRdF5nocKX97rscEjhZok0WkJm7NSqew@mail.gmail.com> <
[🔎]
CAE2SPAZZph1bL64_1AAxovr-pbuy8m8k41wCapqrYe1Jfcg+qw@mail.gmail.com
>
Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
Any news of this bug
I've just tried an arch+indep build as root, an arch only build as root
and an arch+indep build as nobody on my freshly updated armel sid
system. All built successfully.
Reply to:
debian-arm@lists.debian.org
peter green (on-list)
peter green (off-list)
Follow-Ups
:
Re: [kbibtex] FTBS on armel
From:
Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com>
References
:
Re: [kbibtex] FTBS on armel
From:
Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com>
Prev by Date:
Re: Help to test libsdl1.2 bug #520411 on armel?
Next by Date:
libx86 for armhf (and armel)
Previous by thread:
Re: [kbibtex] FTBS on armel
Next by thread:
Re: [kbibtex] FTBS on armel
Index(es):
Date
Thread