[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#594179: dpkg armhf patch acceptance status?



On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 01:20:03AM +0000, Hector Oron wrote:
> Yet another thought, Debian architecture maps to MAtuples, which then
> sets defaults on the toolchain via specs file.

> Does it change something if we use (armel) libgcc1 with armhf specs
> file, rather than have a libgcc1 defaulting for armhf at (cross-)build
> time?

$ objdump -T /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 |grep div
00003c9c g    DF .text  0000020c  GCC_3.0     __divdf3
00003c9c g    DF .text  0000020c  GCC_3.5     __aeabi_ddiv
0000788c g    DF .text  00000448  GLIBC_2.0   __udivdi3
000063e8 g    DF .text  000007a8  GCC_4.0.0   __divdc3
00002ee0 g    DF .text  0000012c  GCC_3.0     __divsi3
00002ec8 g    DF .text  00000018  GCC_3.5     __aeabi_uidivmod
0000300c g    DF .text  00000018  GCC_3.5     __aeabi_idivmod
00002ee0 g    DF .text  00000000  GCC_3.5     __aeabi_idiv
000045c0 g    DF .text  00000160  GCC_3.5     __aeabi_fdiv
000045c0 g    DF .text  00000160  GCC_3.0     __divsf3
00006ecc g    DF .text  000004ac  GLIBC_2.0   __divdi3
00002dcc g    DF .text  000000fc  GCC_3.0     __udivsi3
0000811c g    DF .text  00000550  GCC_3.0     __udivmoddi4
00002dcc g    DF .text  00000000  GCC_3.5     __aeabi_uidiv
000049ec g    DF .text  00000000  GCC_3.5     __aeabi_uldivmod
00005ec0 g    DF .text  00000528  GCC_4.0.0   __divsc3
000049d0 g    DF .text  00000000  GCC_3.5     __aeabi_ldivmod
$

Probably? :)

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com                                     vorlon@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: