Re: ARM summit at Plumbers 2011
- To: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
- Cc: cross-distro@lists.linaro.org, Fedora ARM <arm@lists.fedoraproject.org>, Debian ARM <debian-arm@lists.debian.org>, MeeGo Dev <meego-dev@meego.com>, Gentoo Embedded <gentoo-embedded@lists.gentoo.org>, OpenEmbedded Devel <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>, Ubuntu Devel <ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com>, Mageia Dev <mageia-dev@mageia.org>, OLPC Devel <devel@lists.laptop.org>, GCC developers <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, LSB discuss <lsb-discuss@lists.freestandards.org>, yocto@yoctoproject.org, cooker@mandrivalinux.org
- Subject: Re: ARM summit at Plumbers 2011
- From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:50:50 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4E5BB55A.8050004@redhat.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1314590529.27941.185.camel@constitution.bos.jonmasters.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20110809181534.GR10171@einval.com> <[🔎] 20110823161134.GV3053@linaro.org> <[🔎] 1314590529.27941.185.camel@constitution.bos.jonmasters.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/28/11 22:02, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 17:11 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> UPDATE: we've not had many people confirm interest in this event
>> yet, which is a shame. If you would like to join us for this
>> session, please reply and let me know. If we don't get enough
>> interest by the end of Sunday (28th August), then we'll have to
>> cancel the meeting.
>
> I'm obviously confirming, but I'll repeat that for the record. My
> interests here include helping to lead up Fedora's ARMv7 efforts,
> but also wider ARM platform standardization (boot, device
> enumeration, multi-arch, ABI, kernel consolidation, and many other
> things).
>
> If there's at least representation from a few of the distros (as it
> seems is the case at this point) then I think it's worthwhile having
> the formal slots. Nothing is lost in so doing. In any case, many
> discussions will take place if we have the opportunity to do so.
I've certain got an interest in hashing out ARM relative issues from a
tools standpoint. So count me in.
jeff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOW7VaAAoJEBRtltQi2kC74u8IAIJi+BTmyxbyg8fnYm+lMjq5
K0CKMTpOcDCjZjEOcRx5YrTgOZsEwJKpngvqI82zzbz9vK6Gdw+0HydygaBSZSF7
wBJGv6mmKrP2/ZUts3c68cQDSoNisfeEEZk2MVCrHqm1RZAWW2vynb8zSBr589kV
f7WNEDNTZJwvam7DEZa4/ZAhPUfKxTwREl0H0ZK+miiW47vJtrQiZ6C9KJtFcgLN
Kqo5Jlmtdn2Jmv5s0LXSABtfwRtULqRnTICzZIE8440T4RVDbDI7Sc4jOIy6d31C
YQcKWOjXD9eYzYkOqeJfbLX5bLlOyjfbqfi8lA+jZbTVldjthOGAsmNR5E2h25Q=
=mnMM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: