[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian ARM architectures and subarchitectures

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011, Hector Oron wrote:
> >   Uwe has pointed my to this patch:
> >   < http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/113099 >
>  See the rest of the thread too  :-)
>  Would the kernel team be actually ok with building both a -mx51 *and* a
>  -mx53 in the future?  I suspect it would be too heavy.  In theory
>  CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT should work; it might be broken, but it's
>  clearly the way forward.
>  Anticipating support for mx53, I would recommend you go for -mx5; I'd
>  hope there is sufficient benefits in having a single kernel image that
>  even if this might be broken right now, it would be better to fix it
>  rather than go for two kernels just because of this single issue.


> >   It suggests to use two different subarchitectures for mx51 and mx503.
>  503?

*-mx50 & *-mx53

  -- Héctor Orón

Reply to: