Re: Debian ARM architectures and subarchitectures
Hector Oron <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I am not sure how current Debian subarchitectures map to. Is it just
> a giving name? Do they map to platform devices in linux kernel? Do
> they map to machine devices?
I've not checked but I guess it's following the name of the mach-*
directories in the kernel.
> If I were to add support for Freescales' i.MX51 cores, which would
> be the agreed subarchitecture?
> * mx51
> * mx5
> * mx5x
> * imx51
> * imx5
> * imx5x
I would say mx5 as in mach-mx5 in the kernel but someone needs to check
if it's really possible to have mx50/mx51/mx53 in same kernel. I
remember some people on l-a-k ml saying it was not possible.