Re: cortex / arm-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi (was Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant)
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 04:58:29PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> First, i386 was a bad name (it should have been called x86, or ia32),
> let's not redo the same mistake.
Good point.
> Second, cortex is not a minimum CPU, it's a particular implementation.
> Cortex-A implies ARMv7, but you can be ARMv7 without being a Cortex-A
> implementation (e.g. QCM snapdragon isn't, Marvell Dove isn't).
Hmm, why is arm so complicated. Do they really need 1000 different
CPU variants?
--
Len Sorensen
Reply to: