On 07/06/2010 03:43 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2010-07-06, Brian Szymanski <skibrianski@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Suggested arch names: armfast / armfull ? >> > to later be superceded by armfaster, armsuperfast, armmegafast ? > Heh, no. What I meant was a moving target that has a higher threshold than armel - which could be called armcompat or something.