Re: quick hack that may be usefull to qemu armel users

To: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: quick hack that may be usefull to qemu armel users
From: peter green <plugwash@p10link.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:46:48 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 4B59F298.1070403@p10link.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4B5801A7.4040308@fifthhorseman.net>
References: <[🔎] 4B5667D9.1080003@p10link.net> <[🔎] 4B5801A7.4040308@fifthhorseman.net>

Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:

On 01/19/2010 09:18 PM, peter green wrote:

A while back fsck got more bitchy (treated as an error rather than a
warning) about timestamps in the future, I filed a bug report about this
change in behaviour that breaks but the


this seems to have been cut off -- what is the bug report number?

That sentance should have said but the maintainer downgraded it tonormaland said "I will add an e2fsck.conf option for systems with bustedsystem clocks, but it won't be the default.". The bug in question ishttp://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559776

Afaict the maintainer hasn't done anything to the package since I filedmy bug report.

Are you referring to http://bugs.debian.org/557636 ?

nice to see I'm not the only one who things this change was a bad idea.

Reply to:

References:
- quick hack that may be usefull to qemu armel users
  - From: peter green <plugwash@p10link.net>
- Re: quick hack that may be usefull to qemu armel users
  - From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#566256: g++-4.4: FTBFS because of mangled std::va_list
Next by Date: Re: Some thoughts on the ARM build daemons
Previous by thread: Re: quick hack that may be usefull to qemu armel users
Next by thread: gcl, maxima, acl2, and axiom
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread