Re: cortex / arm-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi (was Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant)
* Aurelien Jarno <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2010-07-16 09:38]:
> BTW, has anybody thought about increasing the minimum requirement for
> the armel port, for example to armv5? Available machines has evolved,
> maybe the port should do the same.
Indeed. From Paul's emails, I'm getting the feeling that moving the
armel port to armv5 and proving optimized libraries for some things
might be the way to go.