[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: armelfp: new architecture name for an armel variant

> This just makes it even more important that any hypothetical FPU-based
> Debian variant thinks very, very carefully about the ABI it uses. There
> is a standard EABI variant for passing parameters in FPU registers ---
> but is it sufficiently common to be useful in a cross-platform OS? Are
> there devices that claim to support VFP that *don't* support this ABI?

The VFP ABI is supported (and the same) on all VFP variants.


Reply to: