Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle

To: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Cc: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle
From: Martin Guy <martinwguy@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:38:00 +0100
Message-id: <56d259a00908181138g39f32638l2e908f673227a1d6@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <20090818182732.GD19413@deprecation.cyrius.com>
References: <8763cogcdy.fsf@pindar.marcbrockschmidt.de> <20090818182732.GD19413@deprecation.cyrius.com>

On 8/18/09, Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> wrote:
> Do we have anything to report here?  IMHO, any release date will work
>  fine for the ARM port since there are no major issues or transitions.

Just checking, as I'm outside the Debian ARM inner circle...

Is the arm port being dropped in squeeze in favour of armel as planned?

Cheers

  The Other Martin

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>

References:
- arm port plans for the squeeze cycle
  - From: Marc Brockschmidt <marc@marcbrockschmidt.de>
- Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>

Prev by Date: Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle
Next by Date: Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle
Previous by thread: Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle
Next by thread: Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread