Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle

To: Martin Guy <martinwguy@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:58:47 -1000
Message-id: <20090818185847.GD19877@deprecation.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <56d259a00908181138g39f32638l2e908f673227a1d6@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8763cogcdy.fsf@pindar.marcbrockschmidt.de> <20090818182732.GD19413@deprecation.cyrius.com> <56d259a00908181138g39f32638l2e908f673227a1d6@mail.gmail.com>

* Martin Guy <martinwguy@gmail.com> [2009-08-18 19:38]:
> Just checking, as I'm outside the Debian ARM inner circle...
> 
> Is the arm port being dropped in squeeze in favour of armel as planned?

Yes.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle
  - From: Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>

References:
- arm port plans for the squeeze cycle
  - From: Marc Brockschmidt <marc@marcbrockschmidt.de>
- Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle
  - From: Martin Guy <martinwguy@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle
Next by Date: Re: kirkwood usb oops using 2.6.30-1
Previous by thread: Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle
Next by thread: Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread