Re: XFS is unsafe (Was: Re: d-i does not show jfs in partition tool)

To: Xan <dxpublica@telefonica.net>
Cc: debian-arm <debian-arm@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: XFS is unsafe (Was: Re: d-i does not show jfs in partition tool)
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 10:27:33 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080908072733.GC14935@deprecation.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 48C394AC.90103@telefonica.net>
References: <1219426136.11725.15.camel@moria> <48AEE71D.8010801@telefonica.net> <1219431354.11725.32.camel@moria> <48B29148.2010508@telefonica.net> <1219665772.4826.5.camel@moria> <48B2C6F0.6010106@telefonica.net> <1219739246.1559.33.camel@moria> <48B413DC.7010207@telefonica.net> <[🔎] 20080906165645.GG23673@deprecation.cyrius.com> <[🔎] 48C394AC.90103@telefonica.net>

* Xan <dxpublica@telefonica.net> [2008-09-07 10:45]:
> Thanks a lot, Martin. Maybe you could mark is as "experimental"

I don't think this is possible.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

Reply to:

References:
- Re: XFS is unsafe (Was: Re: d-i does not show jfs in partition tool)
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: XFS is unsafe (Was: Re: d-i does not show jfs in partition tool)
  - From: Xan <dxpublica@telefonica.net>

Prev by Date: Re: XFS is unsafe (Was: Re: d-i does not show jfs in partition tool)
Next by Date: Re: ext3/ext2 kernel bug with umlauts?
Previous by thread: Re: XFS is unsafe (Was: Re: d-i does not show jfs in partition tool)
Next by thread: Armel upgrade question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread