[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#503292: linux-latest-2.6: new dummy images for Samsung S3C-based devices



Hi there!

Please Cc: me, I'm not subscribed to the d-arm list.

I think I should have cc:ed the d-arm lists when I submitted this bug,
because Samsung S3C is a family of ARM processors, but I simply forgot,
sorry.

If you think your reply should be directed to the bug, please do so,
otherwise let's discuss on the list :-D

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:39:05 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> This discussion started on the smartphones-kernel mailing list [1],
> please keep at least that list cc:ed, TIA.  If you do so, no need to cc:
> me, I read the list.
>
> NB, I decided to go with a wishlist bug instead of directly writing to
> the d-kernel mailing list because at the end linux-latest-2.6 should be
> changed.  Thus, documenting this fact in a bug is IMHO more appropriate.
>
> Basically, the Debian FreeSmartphone.Org Team [2] started to provide a
> Linux kernel package for the Openmoko FreeRunner [3]. FYI, a lot of
> specific patches haven't submmitted to the vanilla Linux kernel yet,
> which means that until that happens the Debian FSO Team must provide is
> own Linux kernel package.
>
> However, since I don't want to duplicate the effort, my idea is to build
> this Linux kernel package as similar to the normal Debian Linux kernel
> packages as possible.  Which means that there should be two "dummy"
> packages, linux-image-$OPENMOKO and linux-image-2.6-$OPENMOKO.
>
> For the other kernel flavors these packages are provided by
> linux-latest-2.6: I'm not here to ask for these dummy packages right
> now.  On the contrary, since I'm going to add them to the
> linux-2.6-openmoko source package [4], for $OPENMOKO I'd like to use a
> name which *maybe* will be the same linux-latest-2.6 will provide in
> future (thus avoiding hardcoded package dependencies).
>
> I thought about the -s3c suffix, because both Openmoko models (GTA01,
> Neo 1973 [5] and GTA02, Neo FreeRunner [6]) use a Samsung SoC from the
> S3C family (2410 and 2442, respectively).  Would this be a good option
> in the long term?
>
> Thx, bye,
> Gismo / Luca
>
> Footnotes: 
> [1] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/smartphones-kernel/2008-October/000013.html
> [2] http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianFSO
> [3] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/smartphones-kernel/2008-October/000007.html
> [4] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-fso/linux-2.6-openmoko.git;a=summary
> [5] http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/GTA01
> [6] http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/GTA02

Attachment: pgp7alo40wBqX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: