Re: [pkg-boost-devel] Boost needs help on ARM
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Ah. I didn't know that. Thanks.
Is there any mechanism to prevent this in future? For example, can
boost be added to a list of packages that are not to be built on a
Netwinders et al. are getting really long in the tooth, and are pretty
underpowered for this kind of thing.
Hedges is a good arm buildd. I think it's got enough horsepower to do
armel work too, but that's an admin thing.
As for developer machines, I've outspent myself putting up hedges and
leisner--- and the latter is blacklisted right now because of the local
root exploit kernel problem. Anyone?