Re: Security buildd for armel
2008/2/8, Daniel Jacobowitz <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 06:48:18PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > So, these Intel boards are _badly_ needed. Or maybe the buildd
> > can be run in qemu on a fast amd64 machine, I don't know if
> > that would work out.
> It would probably be slower than the existing buildd.
It would. you lose about a factor of 12 in (32-bit) AMD MHz to ARM
MHz, and that's when it's running in a straight line; "configur"ing is
If it's just a question of money I don't mind buying the security team
an N2100, but mine is giving segfaults and bus errors on long builds
so you might like to consider something different.