[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Security buildd for armel



On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 06:48:18PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> So, these Intel boards are _badly_ needed. Or maybe the buildd
> can be run in qemu on a fast amd64 machine, I don't know if
> that would work out.

It would probably be slower than the existing buildd.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


Reply to: