RE: Reestructuration of armel and kfreebsd-any repos at GNUAB
Hi,
Binary package of samba in repository must be broken.
Samba fails to start. In logs I noticed internal errors reports and
complaints about linker. Unfortunately I can't recall the exact log
output.
But after I have rebuilt package locally, everything seems to work fine.
Eugene
-----Original Message-----
From: Riku Voipio [mailto:riku.voipio@iki.fi]
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2007 3:40 PM
To: Eugene Sanivsky
Cc: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Reestructuration of armel and kfreebsd-any repos at GNUAB
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 09:38:41PM +0300, Eugene Sanivsky wrote:
> Rebuilding Samba solved the problem.
> Can samba this package be "scheduled" for rebuilding in repository?
Rescheduled. What kind of internal problem where you having?
> Eugene
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eugene Sanivsky [mailto:seugene@marvell.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 5:38 PM
> To: Guillem Jover; debian-bsd@lists.debian.org;
> debian-arm@lists.debian.org
> Subject: RE: Reestructuration of armel and kfreebsd-any repos at GNUAB
>
> Hi,
>
> Today I finally upgraded my armel installation to gnuab's repository.
>
> By now, everything seems to be working ok.
>
> The only issue I found is internal errors in Samba, which I am
> rebuilding now. Hope that will help.
>
> What I am wondering about is next:
> 1) Is there any build log or something like that for the repository?
> Those logs can be very helpful, while testing repository.
> 2) Is that repository open for fixes and patches? Or it's based on
clean
> debian sources?
>
> Eugene
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guillem Jover [mailto:guillem@hadrons.org] On Behalf Of Guillem
> Jover
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 8:44 PM
> To: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org; debian-arm@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Reestructuration of armel and kfreebsd-any repos at GNUAB
>
> Hi,
>
> The kfreebsd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64 and armel repos at GNUAB now carry
> the pure arch:all packages mirrored from the main archive. The
> previously needed sources.list deb line hack[0] is not anymore. This
> will also make it easier to work on D-I and stop bothering users
> about unathenticated packages.
>
> The following should be enough for those architectures:
>
> deb http://ftp.gnuab.org/debian unstable main
> deb http://ftp.gnuab.org/debian unreleased main
>
> regards,
> guillem
>
> [0] <deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian dists/sid/main/binary-i386/>
> which can be removed now from your sources.list
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups
Reply to: