[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is armel project alive?

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 05:19:52PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 04:06:56PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > Good stuff. Which instruction set are you building for? v4t?

> The Debian armel gcc patch that I produced switches the default from
> v5 back to to v4t.  I assume he's using that, so yes, that would be
> v4t (with interworking.)

Correct. OTOH I havent tested it on a armv4t machine, but if is
really important, I expect someone to complain eventually that it
doesn't work ;)

"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: