Re: arm release issues
- To: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>, Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, vince@debian.org, pb@debian.org, wookey@debian.org, riku@debian.org, buytenh@wantstofly.org, kmuto@debian.org, guillem@debian.org, tbm@debian.org, colin@tuckley.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: arm release issues
- From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:18:08 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20060828201808.GA2307@glandium.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>, Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, vince@debian.org, pb@debian.org, wookey@debian.org, riku@debian.org, buytenh@wantstofly.org, kmuto@debian.org, guillem@debian.org, tbm@debian.org, colin@tuckley.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060828201541.GA2261@glandium.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20060828181306.GQ2349@mails.so.argh.org> <[🔎] 20060828184356.GN13639@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <[🔎] 20060828192138.GC1335@glandium.org> <[🔎] 20060828200100.GA15245@mauritius.dodds.net> <[🔎] 20060828201541.GA2261@glandium.org>
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:15:41PM +0200, Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 01:01:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
> > Yes, it can be and is configured by source package. If you can get some
> > numbers to the buildd admin (James) about how long it should take for these
> > packages to build, it should be straightforward to fix up that config AFAIK.
>
> Unfortunately, not being on owner of an arm, I don't have any numbers.
>
> > Does anyone know what happened to make ld so much slower on arm all of a
> > sudden?
>
> Probably the switch to providing debugging symbols, but i'm somehow
> surprised the same doesn't happen seem to happen with firefox, though
> the build is not done the exact same way. The main big part of firefox
> is built as a static binary while in xulrunner it is a big dynamic
> library. Maybe that makes some kind of difference.
> Anyways, on my x86, it already takes quite some time to build this
> library, though again, I don't have timings. But it doesn't take more
> than a few minutes. The main thing is that it takes a huge amount of
> memory. It takes more than 500MB on my build machine. Which means on
> slow machines, with few amounts of memory (arm buildd have 64MB, i
> think), it can take long time, and depending on how ld plays with
> its memory, it can be even worse.
Woooo bad talking, it's 128MB.
I asked quite some long time ago if it was worth having these debugging
symbols packages on all arches, it seems obvious it's particularly
a PITA on arm.
Mike
Reply to: