This one time, at band camp, Daniel Jacobowitz said: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 04:27:33PM +0200, Mirco Bauer wrote: > > We can see here, that the same upstream version and same debian > > revision, show different results between netwinder model > > and cats model: it builds on cats and fails on netwinder (see 1.1.18-3 > > and 1.1.17.1-4). > > > > As said I am not a porter, so I don't know the difference between cats > > and netwinder, but AFAIK cats is v4l and netwinder is v3l. > > > > Upstream tests and only has access to arm v5l and can't reproduce this > > problem, as seen in the upstream bugreport. > > I am pretty sure that's not right; netwinder is a StrongARM, which is > architecture version 4. Very very little is really armv3 any more. > > Of course, as far as I can tell, cats boards are also StrongARM... > maybe someone who knows for sure will correct me if I got that wrong. One of the arm porters sitting next to me says that they are all v4l. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sgran@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature