Re: [Pkg-mono-group] Bug#394418: question for ARM porters: incomplete arm v3 support in etch?
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 04:27:33PM +0200, Mirco Bauer wrote:
> We can see here, that the same upstream version and same debian
> revision, show different results between netwinder model
> and cats model: it builds on cats and fails on netwinder (see 1.1.18-3
> and 1.1.17.1-4).
>
> As said I am not a porter, so I don't know the difference between cats
> and netwinder, but AFAIK cats is v4l and netwinder is v3l.
>
> Upstream tests and only has access to arm v5l and can't reproduce this
> problem, as seen in the upstream bugreport.
I am pretty sure that's not right; netwinder is a StrongARM, which is
architecture version 4. Very very little is really armv3 any more.
Of course, as far as I can tell, cats boards are also StrongARM...
maybe someone who knows for sure will correct me if I got that wrong.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
Reply to: